For CTOs, heads of security, infrastructure leads and CISOs
Know your exposure before anyone asks
When a critical CVE is disclosed, bifrost assesses it against the workload context it already holds: how well protected you are first, then where you have it, how exposed you are, and what to do next. Workloads in enforce were hardened before the CVE was published: each runs under its own profile, and the kernel blocks operations outside it.
What you're up against
A critical CVE is in the news and the first question is "do we have it?" Answering it takes a war room: a fresh scan, a hunt through every environment, a day of engineering time. The question that would actually close the room, "are we protected?", usually gets no answer at all. Meanwhile the scanner backlog keeps growing, most of it findings nothing can reach, and there is no credible way to show the board that the security spend is working.
New to bifrost? See how it works in four steps.
Up to 90%
Fewer CVEs to triage
<1%
CPU overhead in production
< 10 min
First CVE exploitability assessment
What changes with bifrost
bifrost turns runtime behaviour into CVE verdicts and kernel-enforced protection. It learns and evaluates what each workload does, prioritises the vulnerabilities that need attention, and blocks operations outside its enforced security profile. When a new CVE is disclosed, bifrost assesses exposure and protection using the workload context it already holds.
A lookup, not a war room
When a new CVE is disclosed, bifrost assesses it in every environment against the workload context it already holds. No rebuild, no new workload scan. The answer comes in the order the room needs it: protection status, where you have it, how exposed you are, and the next action.
Every workload, down to what it does
No code changes. Every build is learned before it reaches production: what it contains, where it runs, which CVEs it carries, and what it actually does when it runs. bifrost evaluates that behaviour for weaknesses and assesses how fully each workload has been captured. Every verdict, profile and answer on this page is built from that record.
Close the attack window
In enforce mode, each workload runs under its own security profile, generated from its behaviour and enforced by the kernel. Operations outside it are blocked, including what an exploit not yet discovered would need, so protection is in place before a patch exists. Under 1% CPU overhead.
Reachable CVEs, and only those
Every CVE gets a verdict against what actually runs: reachable, mitigated by the profile, or never loaded. bifrost does the triage, and what reaches your team arrives with the evidence behind its verdict.
Board-ready metrics
Where profiles are enforced, which CVEs they mitigate, and reachable CVEs opened and closed: numbers read from runtime data, with their scope stated, that you can defend to a board.
Security that keeps pace with what ships
bifrost automates the recurring work: a profile regenerated with every build, active SBOMs re-scanned through the day, and CVEs re-evaluated against the workload context it already holds. Your team decides when to enforce. Engineering time goes to the reachable list, not the scanner backlog.
What you can show
When the board asks "are we protected?" and the auditor asks "how do you manage vulnerability risk?", the same picture answers both: enforcement records support board reporting and audit preparation alike.
Protection you can point to
Every workload in enforce runs under its own profile, enforced by the kernel, with a record of every deployment and every blocked action. Not a periodic scan that says what was true once: enforcement that is on, and the evidence that it was.
A prioritisation you can defend
"Every CVE gets a verdict against how the workload actually runs, and we fix the reachable ones first." A stronger statement than "we patch the high CVSS scores", and every verdict carries the evidence behind it.
Enforcement coverage, trended
Enforcement coverage and reachable CVEs, trended quarter by quarter from runtime data, each with its scope stated. Numbers you can defend to the board, not estimates.
Records for audit preparation
Profiles, violation logs, SBOM histories and CVE timelines from runtime enforcement, exported whenever an auditor, a regulator or a customer asks.
Executive use cases
Three questions the accountable executive gets asked, and what bifrost answers them with.
The headline CVE
Assessed against the workload context bifrost already holds, in the order the room needs it.
Board-level reporting
What is protected and what still needs action, from runtime data rather than estimates.
A new vendor at the kernel
Assess bifrost the way you would assess anything that runs on every node: by how it deploys and how it ramps.
Know your exposure before anyone asks
See the answer on your own stack: a 30-minute demo, or 14 days on your own cluster.